Thursday, 6 February 2025

RIP my old friend Gemma Nash

 

It was recently the 8th anniversary of my mum's death. I wasn't too worried beforehand, I'm well versed in how to grieve well. I'll plan my days in the ways I usually do, I thought, knowing that the runup is likely to be worse than the day itself and, as usual, have a vague plan for the day with easy, time consuming distractions. In this case I was going to the office with a few simple meetings to attend- ones I've been to a thousand times before, no surprises, no tension. As expected, it was sad week before the day itself (30th January), a few tears here and there, I told a handful of closer colleagues so they need not expect too much from me. 

But with grief you always have to expect the unexpected. This week, only two days ago in fact, I got news that an old friend, Gemma, died. She died last week, on 30th January, the same day as my mum, after a short illness of cancer. I didn't know she had been diagnosed and was very shocked by the suddenness of her not being here any more. I have cried many times in the last few days and the knowledge of her death hits me in waves.

It is true that when someone has been genuinely traumatised the abrasive memories haunt them in pulses- they relive the experience through flashbacks or repeated nightmares. It is as if their brain has found the experience simply too painful to fathom, too emotional to rationally process, and so the unprocessed thoughts go round and round and round, shocking them again and again. Similarly with a less traumatic but still very surprising shock, the thoughts disappear for while (you simply can't cope if they're always present) but then suddenly jolt into your consciousness unexpectedly. This is how I have responded to this shock- wave after sudden wave of upset and tears that are gradually receding as my brain processes the experience and, eventually, accepts the truth of Gemma's death. 

Gemma wasn't a close friend but she was an old friend. We were teenagers when we met and were pretty much inseperable for few years, we were in the same close group, went on holiday together, we even went to Glastonbury music festival together. We shared many drunk evenings together, got stoned for three days after overdosing on homemade "special fudge" and, due to her disability, I accompanied her as a loyal "plus one" on many gigs, family events and even a job interview or two. We were close for years, we shared relationship woes, saw other friendships come and go. We grew apart in our twenties but reconnected through social media a few years back and, although we never physically met again due to geographical distance, there was an unspoken bond that often exists in old friendships. The bond may not have been strong- we weren't as close as we once were- but it's deep and old. 

Gemma was a connection to my past- she was someone who knew me. I have often thought it is unimportant to know people that used to know you, I am not nostalgic and my default setting is "forward". Certainly anyone I have become friends with again after years apart is someone with whom I have a new and valuable relationship based on who they are now and not what we had many years ago. But I have to admit the loss of Gemma is also about a loss of personal history and of my own past. My lived experience- all our lived experiences- is so intertwined with others that to lose someone else is to die a little too. Bereaved people know all this, of course, but sometimes it becomes so clear how much we are of other people, within other people, how much they really are part of our lives even if there's been no contact for 25 years or more. Gemma and I may not have spoken for two decades until recently but she was genuinely formative in my teenage years and therefore formative in who I am as an adult. I will think of her every day until I die and I will miss her greatly. 

Rest in peace, Gemma Nash- musician, artist, disability rights activist, my old friend.








Take Silliness Seriously

 


Don't confuse my silliness as a lack of seriousness or levity. My superfluousness is hard-won, it has taken years, decades of such a broad range of experiences that I have had to conclude how I feel and act. It takes years of sustained reflective effort of all those "serious" experiences  to earn the right to behave exactly how I want. It means I don't have to express interest in some very earnest topics that other people feel are so important- maybe because it isn't important to me or because my resilience tells me not to for self-preservation- and it may mean that lightness, sometimes, is the most valuable approach. 

I take my silliness very seriously, as seriously as I take psychotherapy, and can dismiss seriousness in the blink of an eye, if needed. I can express a lightness of touch that only people who have experienced the exact opposite can express. People like me who have survived the terrible darkness of grief or trauma or depression are also able to fully embrace and appreciate grades of delicacy that many other people are desensitised to- from the deftness of Fred Astaire to the pure joy of a baby's laugh or the nuance of 100 shades of white- we have fought for our right for this. Post-trauma, I have put in the psychic effort of years of reflection and resilience-building, culminating in my legititmate dismissal of irrelevance and my acceptance of importance. My battle was righteous, the result weighty and considered. 

For example, I have little interest in currant affairs or the news, a statement that makes me a little uncomfortable to express. It didn't used to be this way- before Ruby died 11 years ago I would read 3 newspapers a day, listen to the news on the radio, watch it on the TV, I was a news junkie. But now it does not feel informative. I now have a much greater understanding of my own usefulness and knowledge of my sphere of influence and power, I know how I can positively affect negative world events (for example, financial donations, direct local action, supporting affected people through my work helping refugees face to face, etc) and I also know the limits of my influence. In other words, my interest in those events is lower if I cannot contribute to helping those affected and is limited to the scope of my direct action. I still get daily news from different sources but my interest is practical, not broadly informative as it used to be. 

I dismiss the seriousness of current affairs and I dismiss the weight of many "serious" issues if they are totally outside of my control (the Stoics would have us concentrate our greatest efforts on things that are somewhat in our control because those things can be most influenced and should be our main focus, as opposed to things completely in our control about which only a small amount of mental effort should be apportioned). I have earned the right to this dismissal without guilt or blame. I know what counts as serious and what counts as not serious not through superfluous rejection or burying my head in the sand but through studied reflection and mental effort. If I am being breezy and seemingly thoughtless about a topic you can be assured that is very far from the truth. The more likely truth is that I have given the topic great thought and have concluded, on reflection, that is simply isn't worth my psychic energy.

Delicateness, lightness, nuance, silliness. These are extremely important concepts and their profundity should never be confused with a redundancy of thought. To know delicacy you have to feel substance, to be light is to know weight, to truly appreciate nuance you have to have known labyrinthine confusion. And you have to take your silliness seriously.